Challenge was Accepted

Talk about Neversummer 4 with your fellow players.
DM_Kim
Dungeon Master
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by DM_Kim »

Korr wrote:so a PWnD hides scared in his guild hall. . . a DM assissts and its all friendly kills, it wasnt the point!

No I wont reward for that. . . and if you wanna get technical Kim only said that I "have to BE able to pay it" and I can and can prove that I can. Never did Kim say I HAVE to pay it.
I'm a simple type of person. I like to take people at their word. So lets review. I said was: "and if you put that out there, you'd better be not writing checks you PC can't cash.."

To which you replied: "last I checked I have 5 +4 books"

Which to me was a statement that you had the books and would be willing to pay up. Personally I don't think Anthem was hiding scared in his guild hall. I think he was there because of the convince of where the majority of where PWnD had there other PC's logged.

I just love if when players like to accuse us (DMs) of things that we are supposed to have done yet never did. At no time, did I assist PWnD in their kills. I did cast Resurrection and Healing once Anthem to let them know that a couple of kills didn't register as named kills. That they had not completed the task You had laid out over Shout. Until then they didn't even know I was there. I was there to assist YOU in proving that PWnD followed the Shout you had instigated. Because I know how PWnD can be. They know that I know how PWnD can be. PWnD also knows that I do hold them accountable. So I just made sure that they followed some semblance of what I would have perceived as a rule.The least of which was to have different PCs make the kills. I was there working for you Korr.

Then when I SHOUTED back to you that they had their 11th kill, that all the kills were by different PC's, it was YOU who demanded proof by way of Screen Shots, because my word, the word of a DM who witnessed the killings on your behalf, wasn't good enough. So I complied and posted the Screen Shots of my combat log, not that of any player. And still, that now isn't good enough for you. Now you want to go back on your word, make excuses etc... That's fine with me.

In my eyes, your word has no integrity. Think about what that statement means. Oh I know what your thinking, how you don't care, how big and bad Kim is, how bad Kim assisted PWnD etc.. Your mind is just swimming with excuses and reasons to justify yourself.

To All: If making challenges over the Shout Channel, Say What You Mean. Think about what your going to say and if you intend to have conditions state them clearly. Don't make a blatant statements over Shout, then back out of them when people follow what you said. That just blows your word out-of-the-ball-park. I have made that mistake when staging events and had to live with what I said as rules and have rewarded people accordingly.

Personally with Korr's one rule of: "A DM must not be involved in ANY way" means no Witnessing by the staff, no Screen Shots by the staff on Korr's behalf. Which he has already proven, means nothing to him. Have fun trying to collect. :lol:

All Korr need to have added over Shout or by Tell to me was: ~I want to see the kills by different hostile people in the arena.~ I would have helped him out even more. I now know where Korr stands on his word. That's all that mattered to me. :mrgreen:
Mistress Kim
dm_kim999@hotmail.com

*************************************************
Berronar Truesilver - The Revered Mother

Image

Alkapwn
PKer
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:59 pm

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Alkapwn »

Korr's word!! Not as personal slander towards him really. Its something I think i have a little respect for in a ruthless sort of way.
Korr's word means nothing . He's a villain. He's proven it time and time again.
It's great role to play and fun but sometimes he and others may take it a little too personally.
I think it's hillarious that pwnd killed one of there own over and over and then said NO i'm not giving you the books.
In the words of the great and wise Nelson Muntz "HAA HAA!"
::DD:: Minister of Hatemongering and Enemy Carpaccio
Image
:MADD: Resident SlackMaster and KittenPuncher

OpalimTeGolim
Pk Bait
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:54 pm

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by OpalimTeGolim »

Leave Britney Alone!

Chernobyl_Glow
Newbie Helper
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Chernobyl_Glow »

OpalimTeGolim wrote:Leave Britney Alone!
OMG that's funny.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZAr9E8i3ng&feature=fvw
*careful googling this though if you don't like language. some aren't bleeped. this one is and the commentary is pretty great too. lol. love that crap.



back on topic: ... interesting that the "new" rules (for a game that is already over) finds a way to effectively exclude PWnD other than just being a pawn in the game.

laters,

- glow -

ps. thx kim. good try.

Bargeld
PKer
Posts: 1249
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:29 am

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Bargeld »

All i want to say is welcome back Korr.[/sarcasm]
Death Dealers ::DD::
Laufer - Gemetzel - Force - Little Fist - Egil - Torture - Hatshepsu - Nemesis - Hierophant - Supernaut - Flesh Hound - Insurrection - Antithesis - Dead of Winter - Volcanus 2000

Korr
PKer
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:59 am
Location: Lawrence, KS

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Korr »

Well apparently I couldnt rely on everyone else to take the contest in stride without needing to do something underhanded to try and get the prize.

Tal the DMs tried a TD event for more than just books. . . 4 people showed up.

To Kim: IF to watch something happen you have to involve yourself dont blame me. I find it interesting how you could watch TV like that if you feel the need to get involved. Why would you feel the need to ressurect and heal Anthem if there were plenty of PWnD members there who Im sure have access to clerics and/or raise/ress scrolls.

To PWnD: You should know better than to think I would pay for something as childish as the way you pulled that off. But then again I expected you to be better than DD when I started raiding you guys, I guess wrong on both accounts.


Appx 3 hours and 40 minutes left, get to killing!
Amoenotep wrote:korr is the greatest :(
ImageImage

burrahobbit
Champion of Aetheria
Posts: 374
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 2:01 am

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by burrahobbit »

I am not advocating that you pay up or not Kor. What i find interesting is that the kill anthem "event" was blatant harassment. Had things gone differently and it played correctly according to you, the poor guy wouldn't have been safe anywhere. 11 kills is bad enough, but what you originally intended is 33.......

PK anthem 3 times log out grab a new 40, pk anthem 3 times log out grab a new 40.........
I pk anthem three times then my brother Daryl pk's anthem 3 times then my other brother Daryl pk's anthem 3 times then my other other brother Daryl pk's anthem 3 times........
Or every member of DD separately takes a 3 pk turn at killing the guy........

We aren't saying this kind of killing or targeting of a player is ok are we?

I changed my mind, if your going to set up an event to harass a player then i suppose you should have to pay up, no matter how cheezy.
Amoenotep wrote:aaahahahah..burra is dumb! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Rainswept wrote:Oh my. I need to go add a little something to my sig, pardon me.

Korr
PKer
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:59 am
Location: Lawrence, KS

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Korr »

The point WAS to press the rules. Because any one person couldnt PK 3 times then relog and PK again 3 times (without a wait time).

time is up BTW... maybe I will stop in some other time see if anyone is willing to go limits to get +4 books.
Amoenotep wrote:korr is the greatest :(
ImageImage

Rainswept
Newbie Helper
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:32 pm

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Rainswept »

Know what this reminds me of?

This story. Where a guy read the rules of a contest, realized it was much more possible than was intended, and went for it. End result? 1.25million free airline miles for the ingenious man. He collected pudding cups whereas PWnD collected bloodstains.

ImageImage

In honor of this, I suggest we all refer to Korr as "Pudding Cup" henceforth.
Chernobyl_Glow wrote:the players in AO/RK are evil two headed trolls in real life who kick their dogs and speed through school zones
Shamedmonkey wrote:I can feel myself get stupider.

DM_Kim
Dungeon Master
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by DM_Kim »

Korr wrote: To Kim: IF to watch something happen you have to involve yourself dont blame me. I find it interesting how you could watch TV like that if you feel the need to get involved. Why would you feel the need to ressurect and heal Anthem if there were plenty of PWnD members there who Im sure have access to clerics and/or raise/ress scrolls.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Korr: Your just too funny. I love it when people proven my point. If you had read what I said:

"At no time, did I assist PWnD in their kills. I did cast Resurrection and Healing once Anthem to let them know that a couple of kills didn't register as named kills. That they had not completed the task You had laid out over Shout. Until then they didn't even know I was there. I was there to assist YOU in proving that PWnD followed the Shout you had instigated. Because I know how PWnD can be. They know that I know how PWnD can be. PWnD also knows that I do hold them accountable. So I just made sure that they followed some semblance of what I would have perceived as a rule.The least of which was to have different PCs make the kills. I was there working for you Korr."

If you are not willing to come across with a DM witnessing on your behalf, taking screen shots for you etc... I can imagine what turmoil would have come out of this without a DM witness. Specially between you and PWnD. Like the staff doesn't have enough to do in keeping the peace.

and: "Your mind is just swimming with excuses and reasons to justify yourself."
Korr wrote:The point WAS to press the rules. Because any one person couldnt PK 3 times then relog and PK again 3 times (without a wait time).

time is up BTW... maybe I will stop in some other time see if anyone is willing to go limits to get +4 books.
So your so called point was to "press the rules"????? So now your an "instigator"???? So your real intent was to cause problems on the server and play Rules Lawyer, to justify yourself in not paying up??? Should we (the staff) now keep a closer eye on you, because your whole point now was to cause grief to both player and staff alike???? Now that's real interesting. :evil:

(Calls for a staff meeting) :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Mistress Kim
dm_kim999@hotmail.com

*************************************************
Berronar Truesilver - The Revered Mother

Image

Shhhhhhh
Wheres the donation box?
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Shhhhhhh »

Why are you picking on Korr?

Lorkar
Spamalot
Posts: 635
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Just this side of sane

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Lorkar »

All I know is that if it had been anyone else advocating what Korr had they would have been banned.
I put the IO in socIOpath!
Lokey wrote:Yeah, ... I blame Tep in that case.
ImageImage

Amoenotep
Lord DM Supreme
Posts: 4717
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:09 pm
Location: in the mists of eternity

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Amoenotep »

i can change his title to pudding cup ;)
Mask, Lord of the Shadows
Gruumsh, One-Eye
amoenotep@hotmail.com
----------------------------------
Image

Korr
PKer
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:59 am
Location: Lawrence, KS

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Korr »

Ive always pushed the limits. . . this is nothing new. Thats in large part how you build good toon.
Amoenotep wrote:korr is the greatest :(
ImageImage

Daltian
Relic Raider
Posts: 791
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 7:27 pm
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Challenge was Accepted

Post by Daltian »

There are few concerns about this matter I would like to address. First of all I need to say that I don't like Korr at all, even. despize him for his behavior but in this case I see few things that didn't happen as they should.

First of all, whenever bounties were given on this server, it was always by player and in no way DM enforced. It was up to players to trust issuer of bounty or not. Also it was always set up in a way that one that issuess bounty wanted to hurt the one he put up bounty for and not give his friends a bounty.

And it was up to one issuing the bounty to decide if it was deserving to pay up. There was no way to enforce someone because of technicality, or we would need to employ a lawyer when issuing a bounty.

Talking about technicality. Were all those people that killed Anaheim unique players or they logged their other toons to get original kills? If not does venge loging rule or rezing and killing again rule apply here?
xXenox

Locked

Return to “General NS4 Discussion”